Ever since the world has started turning to sustainability and eco-friendliness, chromium has been in the spotlight. Chrome-free leather (also known as FOC) is being advertised as better, smarter and more sustainable of its counterpart, but are we sure that chromium is the real opponent to fight against?
In this article we look into the matter trying to better understand chromium and chromium-related concerns.
In the history of leather processing, tanning has not gone through major transformations. Until the 19th century, vegetable tanning was the most popular technique – alum and other methods were occasionally used, but they were not even close to the prevalent one. Things changed in 1858, when two European technologists (Friedrich Knapp from Germany and Hylten Cavalin from Sweden) invented chrome tanning, which was later patented by the American chemist Augustus Schultz.
The innovation immediately took hold: the new process was significantly faster than the old, vegetable-based one – that is why chrome tanning quickly became the most common leather processing technique. The coeval discovery of fatliquoring (also known as “regreasing”) along with the development of synthetic dyes took care of the rest, confirming chrome tanning as the most popular method. The leather resulting from this kind of processing took the name “wet blue”, with reference to the characteristic hue of the chrome-tanned hides.
Before we dive into further considerations, an essential distinction should be made between chromium (III) and chromium (VI). While the first is harmless as well as an important nutrient that the human body needs in order to process certain sugars, proteins, and fats, the second is a carcinogenic substance that can cause ulceration and fatal poisoning.
Chromium (VI) is definitely harmful, but it generally occurs when leather is processed under improper tanning conditions, or when chrome-tanned materials are disposed of without appropriate handling or kept under high heat conditions without being regularly reviewed.
Today, chromium (III) salts are employed in around 85% of global leather production (as per 2014). Almost all leather shoes and clothing are produced using chrome-tanned material, while FOCs are gaining ground in the upholstering sector. The differences between chrome-tanned and vegetable-tanned leather are many: chrome-tanned leather is stronger, lighter, and softer, and it can be waterproofed more easily.
Unfortunately, the justified concerns about chromium (VI) have led to a general suspicion towards chrome-tanned leather, and producers are likely to pay the price. Advertising FOC products by the words “produced without chromium and pollutants” is devious, because it equates both kinds of chromium (III and VI) and associates chrome tanning with unhealthy practices. The media covering transgressions involving chromium (VI) may have caused some confusion as well, giving the impression that chromium is harmful per se.
Today, chromium tanning still dominates the market. Alternative tanning methods are spreading, but at the moment none of them seems able to replace it completely.
Consumers are growing more and more concerned about sustainability. According to this trend, the companies that fail to address the matter properly an...
Traceability could prove to be a diamond’s best friend. In January, Tiffany & Co launched its Diamond Source Initiative, a project that aims...
Last October the UK Government has demanded that British fashion retailers reveal their environmental records in order to state what kind of policies ...
The Agraloop Bio-Refinery is a new frontier in materials science. The ground-breaking technology, developed by Circular Systems S.P.C., transforms foo...
The first Italian professional education program devoted to the future professionals of the leather industry began in 2017. The vo-tech high school Ga...
Transparency is the key which enables us to realise what we are buying, and what kind of industry we are supporting with our purchases. Our choices (b...
Seven years ago Greenpeace asked fashion companies all around the world to face their environmental responsibilities and take a pledge to stop polluti...
There is always a way to reduce the carbon footprint of our everyday actions, and here at The ID Factory we love to explore (and embrace) new ones. Th...
On January 9, 2018 The Rainforest Alliance formally merged with UTZ, the largest certification program for sustainable farming of coffee, cocoa, tea, ...
The CEO Agenda 2018 is an unprecedented document that is meant to lead the fashion industry into a more sustainable reality. It sets out seven key pri...
Lately, we hear a lot about Circular Economy. What does the expression mean, and why does it arouse such a considerable interest? Here at The ID Facto...
The ID Factory has recently attended two prominent international events about manufacturing and the leather industry: Mipel and Lineapelle. We took th...
The acronym CITES is a recurring term when it comes to the manufacturing of animal products and traceability, but what does it mean? CITES is t...
Last month Kering has been named the most sustainable textile, apparel and luxury goods corporation in the world, according to the Corporate Knights...
The supply chain behind leather goods can be complex and diversified, and being aware of its stages and key phases is essential to implement traceabil...
Today’s leather industry has to handle a globalised market in which the supply chain is complex and unclear at times. Hides and skins are traded...
The Certification granted to us by Bureau Veritas is one of the accomplishments we are most proud of. Bureau Veritas is an institution based in Belgi...
The sole of the sneaker will be made with petroleum-free, non-toxic industrial-grown corn, while the body of the shoe will be made with 100 percent or...